Staking and yield farming

Three ways to participate

The proposed Earn area connects SVRN staking, liquidity incentives and project-sponsored rewards. Single-token staking commits SVRN to a particular campaign. A receipt-token farm would accept only the exact reviewed ERC-20 receipt from a supported liquidity or lending vault. Ecosystem campaigns let a sponsor fund rewards in a reviewed asset for participants in a defined program.

The original TokenStakingVault remains custody-only. The separate FundedRewardsCampaign is deployed on Robinhood Chain at 0x0Ca5A1CA8B10857A5948b80D7E948d593B039216. It accepts SVRN reward funding from the two approved wallets. Participant staking is not activated. No reward amount, schedule, stake cap, platform fee or farm receipt has been approved for opening a campaign.

Rewards must arrive first

This campaign uses SVRN for both staking and rewards. Its fixed funding wallets are the protocol treasury, 0xd427E05687Cd5A84bd4d4A450906eC221c0C936F, and the first administrator, 0xBeBF8fFA2E686Fa9de5c15949195EF17465aaF72. Either can approve a specific amount and call fund. The contract records each contribution separately; before activation each wallet can reclaim only its own contribution. Direct token transfers do not enlarge the campaign budget. Both administrators must approve the exact budget, future start, end and total stake cap before participant staking opens.

The Fund staking rewards screen verifies the chain, proxy implementation, runtime code, token and funding roles. Approval and funding are separate wallet requests, each with a review. Pending requests are saved in the browser and receipts are checked against the expected action and amount. An uncertain wallet response must be reconciled before another request. The site never receives a private key.

A changed funding amount invalidates activation against the previously approved amount. After activation, the budget and schedule cannot be edited through normal campaign functions. A new program needs its own reviewed configuration. Privileged upgrades can change behavior and remain part of the administration risk.

Participation determines the share

The draft releases its fixed budget across a defined interval. At each balance change, a cumulative reward index allocates newly released tokens in proportion to the stake held during that interval. Users entering later do not receive rewards earned before their entry. A balance borrowed and returned within the same timestamp earns no elapsed-time reward.

If nobody is staked during an interval, those rewards remain unallocated. After the campaign ends, each funding wallet can recover its proportional share of that unused budget, based on its contribution at activation. Duplicate refunds are blocked. Staked principal is tracked separately, including when SVRN is both assets. Claimed amounts reduce the reward reserve. Rounding dust is retained and allocated claims have no normal expiry or sweep.

This is a proposed allocation rule, not an approved production offer. Actual returns depend on the funded budget, elapsed time, total participation and asset prices. No APY or token-price increase is promised. Rewards in another project token carry that token’s own liquidity and price risks.

Interval reward share = funded tokens released in that interval × your stake ÷ total participating stake

Separate withdrawal from claiming

The draft allows ordinary stake withdrawal without a lock term or exit fee. Withdrawal checkpoints the account and retains any earned claim. Claiming is a separate transaction; a failing reward transfer need not prevent withdrawal of a different, functioning stake token. A standard risk pause stops new commitments while normal withdrawals and claims remain possible.

Recovery is different. Both administrators can activate recovery and remove held assets, including participant funds. Accrual freezes at the recovery timestamp and recorded stakes and claims remain reference accounting. They may no longer be backed after recovery. Either administrator may pause; upgrades and recovery require both. There is no claim that this is insured or immutable custody.

Long liquidity and future farms

SVRN is already traded against AI on Long. Its launch uses a Uniswap v4 hook and a fee-manager arrangement. The existence of that pool does not establish an ordinary transferable LP token available to stake. The current campaign draft accepts ERC-20 assets, not arbitrary Uniswap position NFTs.

A farm needs a reviewed position or receipt, verified ownership and withdrawal rights, and a defined measure of eligible liquidity. Uniswap v4 subscribers are a direction for future NFT-position incentives, allowing notifications without transferring the NFT to a farm. Position changes alone do not prove historical time in range, and Long-hook compatibility remains unverified. No such adapter or in-range reward program is currently deployed by Serevin.

Liquidity fees, campaign rewards and lending interest are different sources of return. Liquidity positions can lose value relative to holding their component tokens, and concentrated positions stop earning swap fees when out of range. Serevin does not classify the Long pool as a reward budget or lendable cash.

A role for SVRN across the ecosystem

The product direction is to let projects sponsor defined campaigns for SVRN participants while Serevin provides the campaign infrastructure, review and discovery. Membership remains a separate choice for finite service access. Any campaign setup fee, platform fee or discount requires its own approved terms. No fee rate or automatic treasury allocation has been selected.

Budgets can come from a project’s incentive allocation or collected, discretionary protocol revenue after other obligations are accounted for. Token-holder deposits, loan principal and redemption backing are not automatic reward funding. A campaign is useful only if sponsors and participants value the underlying activity after incentives end.